International migration roundtables summary

Understanding migration is important to aid decision making across society – from understanding the changing workforce needs in hospitals and schools or the demands placed on these services, to the impact of population turnover in areas across the UK and in different industry sectors.

Two recent Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) roundtable events threw a spotlight on various aspects of these information needs, and revealed potential opportunities to help address them. The proposed solutions included both short and medium term opportunities, through new ideas volunteered by statistical producers during the discussions. The producers identified that some of issues raised are being tackled in the longer term developments announced in September 2017 by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on behalf of the Government Statistical Service (GSS) Migration Steering Group, which require the sharing and linking of various administrative data sets held across Government.

The roundtable discussions highlighted widespread stakeholder support for the proposed ideas, and particularly GSS migration development plan to produce new analyses based on linked data, but strongly emphasised the need for urgency and continued cross-departmental collaboration. Stakeholders were also unclear about how they and other users would be kept informed about access to any newly developed outputs.

OSR recommends that the statistics producers update the cross-GSS migration development plan, to set out the roles of the individual departments in producing new statistics based on shared administrative data, and to reflect the commitments that departments have made to address stakeholders’ identified needs. The updated plan should include details about how users will be kept informed about progress. OSR will monitor producers’ progress against their commitments.


Related links

Letter from Ed Humpherson to Iain Bell

Health and Care Statistics User conference summary

Following a series of assessments in 2015, we identified systemic issues affecting health and care statistics in England. Fundamentally, because there was no single individual or organisation with clear leadership responsibility for health and care statistics in England, this led to problems with the coherence and accessibility of these statistics. To instigate change, we ran the first phase of our systemic intervention for the past two years, with staff from the Office for Statistics Regulation convening and leading three Round Table meetings and two conferences.

This latest conference provided an opportunity for users to engage with statistics producers to explain their needs in detail, postulate some key questions that need answering, hear updates of the progress made since the last conference and to form effective working relationships going forward. Producers have been able to learn from each other, understand users’ future needs to help inform the development of their statistics and collaborate to create effective solutions.


Presentations

Ed Humpherson: Putting users at the heart of health and social care statistics  (PDF)

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter: Making statistics accessible, useable and assessable (PDF)

Full Fact Fact checking statistics (PDF)

John Morris: Health Care Quality Indicators (PDF)

Scott Heald and Maighread Simpson: A perspective from Scotland (PDF)

Abbie Self: Putting users at the heart of statistics (PDF)

 

Public value of statistics on Housing and Planning in the UK

Housing matters and it affects all citizens in the UK. Official statistics on housing and planning play a vital role in helping to inform decision-making of all kinds.

This review and its findings are focussed on the user perspective. We’ve heard a number of users’ views across the UK on the value of these statistics, and how well they meet their needs. This perspective – based on feedback from over 60 users across 43 organisations – has allowed us to build a picture about the statistical landscape for this topic, and the necessary drivers needed to improve these statistics to increase their public value. Value means that the data and statistics are easy to use, remain relevant, and benefit society, helping the public to understand important issues and answer key questions.

Overall, the topic of housing and planning appears to be well served by an impressive volume of official statistics. Our report highlights a number of areas of good practice in statistical production from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. We have also identified opportunities for improvements to the statistical landscape at two levels: firstly, improvements to statistical outputs can help shine a light on society’s evolving questions about housing and planning in the UK. Secondly, more strategic coordination and collaboration between statistics producers across the UK, as well as greater engagement with users, can help drive improvements in outputs.

We think that starting from the users’ perspective is an essential prerequisite to improvements. This review provides a user-based stocktake, and it is therefore the starting point for these improvements. We welcome statistics producers being open to feedback and willing to listen to these views. We would be very happy to help facilitate changes, and to that end will continue to engage with producers and users of these statistics.

 

Roundtable meetings: opportunities for sharing and linking data

Statistics on crime and on justice are used a lot — inside and outside of government —but more could be done to look at crime and justice from the perspective of its effect on people and organisations. Increasing the extent of sharing and linking data enable these perspectives, uncovering new insight and increasing the value of statistics that tell us about crime and justice.This was the focus of the London round table. It brought together attendees from the Home Office, Ministry of Justice and the Office for National Statistics to explore how they might work together to share and link crime and justice data in England and Wales. All three of the producer organisations gave examples of where they had previously linked data and clearly see the benefit of doing more of this work in the future. The participants had a productive discussion to identify where they could use linkage of data — including linking to data beyond crime and justice — to improving value. The ideas generated will require further work and prioritisation and the three organisations agreed to put together ideas for data sharing and linking over the next few months.

Read the notes for the first roundtable here

At a second meeting in November 2017, the three organisations told us about the crime and justice working group, where they have come together to develop their work joining-up crime and justice statistics and data. They have committed to including representatives from Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland in this work. We expect to hear about their progress and will publish an update in early summer 2018.

Read the notes for the second roundtable here

Roundtable meeting: Sharing information on crime statistics across the UK

Crime statistics are well used and highly valued across the UK by people and organisations inside and outside of government. Producer organisations’ resources are stretched at a time when information needs are increasingly complex. This meeting brought together representatives from the UK’s main crime statistics producer organisations. Its aim was to explore opportunities to share information and facilitate joint working to help ensure that crime statistics keep up with ever-changing developments in the real world. We heard that meetings to discuss technical ‘nuts and bolts’ issues take place as the need arises and are highly valued. However, opportunities to hold similar conversations about more strategic issues are rarer, and welcome. There will continue to be changes to technology and society that crime statistics need to reflect and we encourage producer organisations across the UK to make opportunities to meet regularly and at a strategic level.

Read the notes from this round table here

Summary of the second Health and Care Round Table

In December 2016 the Office for Statistics Regulation convened the second Round Table meeting, where many of the leaders of the English health and care system discussed how to move forward with the agenda of improving English health and care statistics to better serve the public good. You can read the summary of this meeting here.  A third Round Table took place in March 2017.


Related links:

Summary of the first Round Table

Summary of the third Round Table

 

Better Statistics Better Decisions Health and Care Summit

Following up our key Stakeholders Round Table, we ran the Better Statistics, Better Decisions Health and Care Summit, which was a platform for producers and users to shape the future landscape for English health and care statistics together. A compelling vision for an improved system providing high quality statistics underpinning better decisions inside and outside of public administration was set out. Participants in the Summit enthusiastically embraced this vision. Links to a note taken from the Health and Care Summit along with Ed Humpherson’s summary of the strategic issues that these events highlighted, presentations from the Summit and an attendee listing are given below.

We are following up these Health and Care events in a number of ways. We:

  • Publicly invite those who attended the Summit to be key ambassadors for taking forward initiatives to tackle these strategic issues back in their own organisations
  • Support the drive to address these issues
  • Are reconvening the Round Table and play back the proceedings from the Summit
  • Are liaising with main statistics producers and asking them to create action plans, which would have the status of voluntary enhancements. Over time we will monitor progress against these action plans and consider regulatory action if progress is insufficient or too slow
  • Invite people to reconvene in a year’s time to take stock; the planning for this will start later this year.

Health and care statistics producers now convene through an English Health Statistics Steering Group to effect greater coordination of their activities. Ed Humpherson is writing to these producers commissioning a joint action plan, which the English Health Statistics Steering Group will coordinate.

The RSS has also asked the Statistics Authority to contribute to a session on Health and Care Statistics – What is the Future? at its Conference between 5th and 8th as part of our public support of producers’ initiatives to enhance health and care statistics. We continue to meet with the key bodies to establish what further activity we as regulators of official statistics need to take.


Related Links:

HCI Terms of Reference

Director General for Regulation’s Summary of Strategic Issues highlighted by the Health and Care Summit

Note of the Health and Care Summit


Presentations from the Health and Care Summit:

Ed Humpherson Keynote Address

A local government perspective – Juliet Whitworth

Mind’s use of data – Stephen Buckley

Collaborating to maximise impact – Jamie Jenkins

UK Health Accounts – James Lewis

PHE and local authorities – Kate Sweeney and Andy Baker

 


Attendees

Summary of the first Health and Care Round Table

In February 2016 the UK Statistics Authority convened a meeting – a Round Table – of many of the leaders of the English health and care system to discuss how English health and care statistics could be enhanced to better serve the public good: how the statistics might be improved, in order to support better decision making.

Health and Care Statistics in England – The Statistics Authority’s direction of travel summarises the outcomes of the Round Table.

There was support for the UK Statistics Authority’s strategy for UK Statistics – Better Statistics, Better Decisions – which starts from the independence and professionalism of statisticians as the essential pre-requisite to trustworthiness, and looks for systems of statistics which then demonstrate the following attributes:  Helpful;  Innovative;  Professional;  Efficient; Capable.

The Round Table agreed that at its best the health and care statistical system in England satisfies these criteria but concluded that generally the service provided for users by the decentralised system was incoherent and inconsistent. You can read the summary of the first Round Table here.

 


List of Annexes

Annex A – Round table attendees

Annex B – updated version of the Health and Care Statistics Landscape  (some internal links do not open with Internet Explorer, please use an alternative browser)

Annex C – February 2016 Health and Social Care Statistics List

Annex D – Health round table paper


Related Links

Second Round Table

Third Round Table

Coherence and Accessibility of Official Income and Earnings Statistics

In July 2015, the UK Statistics Authority held an event for over 100 key stakeholders on the Coherence and Accessibility of Official Statistics on Income and Earnings.

This event was hosted by Ed Humpherson, the Director General of Regulation and John Pullinger, the National Statistician, as part of our review into this area.

The event followed the Authority’s published review into this area which considered the way in which official statistics about income and earnings, and their components, are presented, with a particular focus on:

  • Coherence – the extent to which official statistics drawn from different sources, and about different components of income and earnings, complement one another; also, whether there are any significant gaps in the statistical picture.
  • Accessibility – the extent to which users of official statistics on income and earnings are able to find, understand and use the statistics; and whether related statistics are presented in ways that help users to understand the interrelationships.

The main purpose of the event was to consider how official statistics on income and earnings can better serve the public good in the future. The event was designed for statistics producers from the Government Statistical Service to present to the audience about recent and proposed changes and improvements to income and earnings statistics, and provided an opportunity for the audience to provide feedback on whether the proposals were in line with their expectations, and prioritised appropriately. The event also included speakers from the Resolution Foundation, Full Fact and the New Policy Institute.

The key themes raised were:

  • Timely data on self-employment income was a key gap.
  • There was recognition that this was a complex area with lots of different statistics and lots of different users needs, and it would be wrong to over-simplify and combine sources without considering the different user needs.
  • The increased timeliness of statistics from surveys would increase their value.
  • While the UK perspective was important it was essential that devolved administrations were not forgotten, and the need for regional and local statistics.
  • The need for more collaboration and raising awareness between statistics producers and expertise outside government.

We are in the process of requesting updates from statistics producers about further progress relating to the Review’s recommendations, and plan to publish a formal update by the end of the year.

Please help us improve our website by answering a few quick questions.